The Internet Archive, home to the popular Wayback Machine, is a digital library that preserves snapshots of websites, books, audio, videos, and more. It allows users to explore historical versions of websites, providing access to billions of archived web pages that might otherwise be lost. This resource is crucial for researchers, journalists, and anyone looking to access historical internet content, making it a central repository of digital memory.
The recent breach of the Internet Archive on October 9, 2024, exposed the data of 31 million users, including usernames, email addresses, and bcrypt-hashed passwords. The scale of this breach highlights significant vulnerabilities, posing risks not just to user privacy but to the integrity of one of the internet’s most essential resources.
The Breach and Its Impact
On October 9, 2024, a JavaScript pop-up appeared on the Internet Archive’s website, archive.org, delivering a message that sent ripples through the community: the site had been hacked, exposing the data of 31 million users. The data, including usernames, email addresses, and bcrypt-hashed passwords, was soon confirmed as legitimate by Troy Hunt, a renowned security researcher and founder of the “Have I Been Pwned” (HIBP) service. According to Hunt, the data had been circulating since late September, and its addition to HIBP allows users to check if their information was exposed.
The implications of this breach are profound. It underscores the inherent risks in any system that manages user data, even those perceived as safe havens like the Internet Archive. The organization’s mission to preserve online history makes it a pillar of cultural memory, but also a target for those who aim to disrupt and expose its underlying vulnerabilities.
Read Also: Each AI Query Uses Three Bottles of Water: It’s Adding Up
Why Store So Many User Credentials?
The Internet Archive’s storage of user credentials is tied to its community features. While much of its content can be accessed without an account, users who contribute content, create collections, or use personalized tools like bookmarks and reading lists need accounts. These accounts are managed with usernames, emails, and passwords to authenticate users and keep track of their contributions. Additionally, the storage of these credentials enables the Archive to support users who want to interact with and curate digital collections, ensuring a more organized and participatory online library.
However, storing user credentials, even when hashed, introduces risks. The need to authenticate users to allow for contributions and customization inadvertently creates a potential point of exposure. This is a common challenge faced by any online platform offering user-specific features—balancing ease of access and personalization with security.
The Attack in Context: A Perfect Storm
The breach coincided with a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack, which temporarily disrupted the site’s functionality. A group called SN_Blackmeta claimed responsibility for the DDoS attacks, though there is no clear evidence that they were involved in the actual data breach. This coordination—or coincidence—between different types of attacks raises critical questions about whether this was a targeted campaign against the Archive.
It’s a stark reminder of the “perfect storm” that many organizations can face. Attacks on multiple fronts—data breaches, DDoS, defacement—place enormous strain on the resources of any organization, particularly one like the Internet Archive, which is a nonprofit with limited capacity for rapid crisis response.
The Role of Responsible Disclosure and Transparency
Troy Hunt, upon discovering the stolen data, reached out to the Internet Archive to facilitate a disclosure process. However, the timing of the site’s defacement and DDoS attacks added layers of complexity. Hunt encouraged early public disclosure, but he also empathized with the Archive’s situation, acknowledging their struggle to balance transparency with managing the crisis.
In an era where trust is paramount, transparency during a security incident is crucial for maintaining user confidence. Yet, this incident highlights the delicate balance between disclosing information to affected users and managing the immediate operational threats from coordinated attacks. The Internet Archive’s hesitance to comment initially may have been a misstep, but it reflects the difficult choices leaders must make in the heat of a cybersecurity crisis.
Lessons on Vulnerability
This breach also serves as a broader lesson in the vulnerabilities that accompany even the most altruistic missions. The Internet Archive is more than a repository of old websites—it is a digital library, a memory of the internet’s past, and a testament to the free flow of knowledge. And yet, like any entity, it relies on user data to support its community features, such as contributions, collections, and personalized tools. This necessity became a potential point of exposure, reminding us that even services rooted in public good must navigate the complex terrain of user data management.
While bcrypt-hashing passwords offers a degree of protection, the breach of email addresses and other data still presents risks to users, particularly if such data is reused across services. For end-users, this event is a critical reminder of the importance of strong, unique passwords and the value of using password managers to mitigate risks across multiple platforms.
The Broader Ramifications for Nonprofits and Digital Stewards
For nonprofit organizations like the Internet Archive, the challenge of cybersecurity is compounded by limited resources. While large tech firms may have the capacity to deploy sophisticated security measures and respond swiftly to breaches, smaller entities often find themselves at a disadvantage. Yet, the stakes remain high, as the loss of user trust can undermine even the most well-intentioned missions.
Brewster Kahle, the Archive’s founder, responded by detailing immediate steps taken—disabling the compromised JavaScript library, implementing system “scrubbing” to fend off further DDoS attempts, and tightening overall security protocols. These measures are critical, but they also speak to a reactive rather than a proactive approach.
A Call for Community Support and Understanding
Despite its challenges, the Internet Archive remains a vital part of the online ecosystem. It’s easy to criticize an organization under attack, especially when user data is involved. But as Hunt noted, there is a need for understanding, given the Archive’s unique role and the extraordinary circumstances it faces. It is a nonprofit striving to preserve the world’s online history, often with limited support and against significant legal and technical challenges.
In recent months, the Archive has faced legal battles, such as Hachette v. Internet Archive, where it was accused of copyright infringement for its digital lending practices. Now, it faces an even graver threat—potential damages of $621 million in another copyright lawsuit. This legal pressure, coupled with cybersecurity challenges, creates a precarious situation that could threaten the very existence of a service many consider essential.
Resilience Through Collaboration
What the Internet Archive needs now is not just criticism but support. This includes collaboration from the broader tech community to help bolster its defenses, as well as recognition from legal and regulatory bodies of the unique role it plays. As technology leaders, we have a responsibility to offer both resources and expertise to organizations that aim to enrich the public good.
There’s a broader lesson here, too, about the fragility of online trust. As more of our lives migrate to digital platforms, users increasingly expect safety and privacy. But breaches like this remind us that perfect security is an aspiration rather than a guarantee. Organizations that steward user data must constantly adapt and innovate to protect their users—not only because it’s a legal requirement but because it is foundational to their mission.
A Wake-Up Call
The Internet Archive breach is more than just a story of a nonprofit under attack—it is a wake-up call for how we think about resilience, user trust, and the responsibilities of all stewards of online information. In an era where even the custodians of the internet’s memory are vulnerable, we must all confront the uncomfortable truth: the internet’s past, present, and future require vigilant protection. And as we move forward, we must do so with a renewed commitment to supporting those who work tirelessly to keep our shared online history alive.
For leaders in tech, this is a call to action. Let’s stand by those who aim to preserve knowledge, not only with words but with actions that reinforce the resilience of our shared infrastructure. Because in the end, the strength of our online ecosystem lies not just in the technology we build, but in the communities and partnerships we foster to protect it.
Nabeil Sarhan, MBA, is a dynamic technology delivery manager with over 15 years of experience in tech, cybersecurity, and computing scalability. He excels in leading diverse teams and delivering enterprise-class systems across industries such as healthcare, finance, and retail. Nabeil’s passion for solution design, systems architecture, and performance optimization makes him a sought-after consultant. He holds degrees from Harvard, MIT, and Bryant University. Connect with Nabeil on LinkedIn or Twitter